Raw, total lack of though out inteligent argument.
This individual, if it is only one, shows a total disinterest in inteligent critique. The arguments displayed seem to have been whipped together on-the-go, based on nonreflective glances into one english translation ( most likely a "today's language" version) that is unsuitable and improper for theological study.
Also, it is obvious that the author(s) have not read the entire scripture in the biblical cannon suficiently enough to understand Greek/Hebrew context or the contemporary cultures of the bible.
Any attempt to discuss biblical truth in the manner it is presented here would be futile, for lack of evidence that the author(s) is/are interested in truth rather than intrigue. A suggestion should be made that this/these unlearned indiviual/s spend time asking questions and humbly exposing their doubts to someone with even a few years of personal dedicated study, to better understand what they are crticising.
This is like a self appointed judge, casting a verdict before ever hearing the case.